Comments on: Were you spammed by Stewart Photo Supplies too? http://inphotos.org/were-you-spammed-by-stewart-photo-supplies-too/ no photoshopped images here Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:13:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Trade Show Displays http://inphotos.org/were-you-spammed-by-stewart-photo-supplies-too/#comment-188878 Trade Show Displays Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:43:27 +0000 http://inphotos.org/were-you-spammed-by-stewart-photo-supplies-too/#comment-188878 It does look trashy that they put the text like that, it could have been done better. The color red attacts the eye and that is probably why they used it It does look trashy that they put the text like that, it could have been done better. The color red attacts the eye and that is probably why they used it

]]> By: Will Monster.ie get away with spamming? at Holy Shmoly! http://inphotos.org/were-you-spammed-by-stewart-photo-supplies-too/#comment-97754 Will Monster.ie get away with spamming? at Holy Shmoly! Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:53:00 +0000 http://inphotos.org/were-you-spammed-by-stewart-photo-supplies-too/#comment-97754 [...] Photo Supplies spammed a large number of photography related email addresses a few weeks back, but then they apologised [...] [...] Photo Supplies spammed a large number of photography related email addresses a few weeks back, but then they apologised [...]

]]> By: Donncha O Caoimh http://inphotos.org/were-you-spammed-by-stewart-photo-supplies-too/#comment-95848 Donncha O Caoimh Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:55:01 +0000 http://inphotos.org/were-you-spammed-by-stewart-photo-supplies-too/#comment-95848 Michele - none whatsoever, but they emailed the info @ mallowcameraclub.com address which is an obvious contact point for a photography club. Robert has kindly apologised and I'm very happy with that. Michele – none whatsoever, but they emailed the info @ mallowcameraclub.com address which is an obvious contact point for a photography club. Robert has kindly apologised and I’m very happy with that.

]]> By: Michele http://inphotos.org/were-you-spammed-by-stewart-photo-supplies-too/#comment-95842 Michele Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:51:16 +0000 http://inphotos.org/were-you-spammed-by-stewart-photo-supplies-too/#comment-95842 Donncha Did you signup to receive mails from them or have any previous dealings with them? Michele Donncha

Did you signup to receive mails from them or have any previous dealings with them?

Michele

]]> By: Robert Seale http://inphotos.org/were-you-spammed-by-stewart-photo-supplies-too/#comment-95817 Robert Seale Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:29:25 +0000 http://inphotos.org/were-you-spammed-by-stewart-photo-supplies-too/#comment-95817 Apologies to all for the recent email regarding our show in Cork yesterday. Due to human error the names were sent out in an open email rather than the usual way we send email's, in the bcc file which protect's our customer's email address. This was a one off which will not happen again. Robert Seale. Apologies to all for the recent email regarding our show in Cork yesterday.
Due to human error the names were sent out in an open email rather than the
usual way we send email’s, in the bcc file which protect’s our customer’s email address.
This was a one off which will not happen again.
Robert Seale.

]]> By: Donncha O Caoimh http://inphotos.org/were-you-spammed-by-stewart-photo-supplies-too/#comment-95791 Donncha O Caoimh Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:12:19 +0000 http://inphotos.org/were-you-spammed-by-stewart-photo-supplies-too/#comment-95791 Michele - no, it's been years since I've used spamcop. Never thought of it. Niall - possibly, but it's in a jpeg so not scrapable by bots. Josef - thanks for trying :) Michele – no, it’s been years since I’ve used spamcop. Never thought of it.

Niall – possibly, but it’s in a jpeg so not scrapable by bots.

Josef – thanks for trying :)

]]> By: Niall O'K http://inphotos.org/were-you-spammed-by-stewart-photo-supplies-too/#comment-95789 Niall O'K Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:48:33 +0000 http://inphotos.org/were-you-spammed-by-stewart-photo-supplies-too/#comment-95789 Shouldn't you really obscure/blur the addresses in the first picture? Shouldn’t you really obscure/blur the addresses in the first picture?

]]> By: Michele http://inphotos.org/were-you-spammed-by-stewart-photo-supplies-too/#comment-95160 Michele Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:55:12 +0000 http://inphotos.org/were-you-spammed-by-stewart-photo-supplies-too/#comment-95160 Did you spamcop them? Did you spamcop them?

]]> By: Josef Renklint http://inphotos.org/were-you-spammed-by-stewart-photo-supplies-too/#comment-95130 Josef Renklint Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:14:56 +0000 http://inphotos.org/were-you-spammed-by-stewart-photo-supplies-too/#comment-95130 Jesus. Nevermind. Jesus. Nevermind.

]]> By: Josef Renklint http://inphotos.org/were-you-spammed-by-stewart-photo-supplies-too/#comment-95129 Josef Renklint Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:14:34 +0000 http://inphotos.org/were-you-spammed-by-stewart-photo-supplies-too/#comment-95129 Hum. WordPress doesn't want me to type "". But that's what goes where the dots are in my previous comment. Hum. WordPress doesn’t want me to type “”. But that’s what goes where the dots are in my previous comment.

]]>