<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The RAW Backlash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inphotos.org/the-raw-backlash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inphotos.org/the-raw-backlash/</link>
	<description>no photoshopped images here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:13:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donncha</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/the-raw-backlash/#comment-2780</link>
		<dc:creator>Donncha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/the-raw-backlash/#comment-2780</guid>
		<description>I do post-process photos but life&#039;s too short. I&#039;d rather be out there shooting than sitting in front of my PC!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do post-process photos but life&#8217;s too short. I&#8217;d rather be out there shooting than sitting in front of my PC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/the-raw-backlash/#comment-2778</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/the-raw-backlash/#comment-2778</guid>
		<description>To be clear, I could MAKE the time to postprocess Raw files, but I don&#039;t enjoy postprocessing so I seldom do make the time. I never had any desire to set up a darkroom back when I shot film, and as it turns out I don&#039;t have any desire to fuss with a digital darkroom, either. It&#039;s a matter of personal likes and dislikes.

Oh, and I get amused at people who say that it&#039;s faster to postprocess Raw than JPEG. That&#039;s only true if you postprocess your JPEGs. My goal is to not postprocess. Ideally I could use the Direct Print button on my camera or take my CF card down to Target and get prints without ever turning my computer on.

Getting pictures that good &quot;in the camera&quot; requires a set of skills and related experience beyond what it takes to shoot Raw. After a few months of experimenting, I think I&#039;m getting close. At least for outdoor daytime shots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be clear, I could MAKE the time to postprocess Raw files, but I don&#8217;t enjoy postprocessing so I seldom do make the time. I never had any desire to set up a darkroom back when I shot film, and as it turns out I don&#8217;t have any desire to fuss with a digital darkroom, either. It&#8217;s a matter of personal likes and dislikes.</p>
<p>Oh, and I get amused at people who say that it&#8217;s faster to postprocess Raw than JPEG. That&#8217;s only true if you postprocess your JPEGs. My goal is to not postprocess. Ideally I could use the Direct Print button on my camera or take my CF card down to Target and get prints without ever turning my computer on.</p>
<p>Getting pictures that good &#8220;in the camera&#8221; requires a set of skills and related experience beyond what it takes to shoot Raw. After a few months of experimenting, I think I&#8217;m getting close. At least for outdoor daytime shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Marlow</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/the-raw-backlash/#comment-2761</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Marlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/the-raw-backlash/#comment-2761</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a really interesting set of articles. I shot JPEG for about 18 months after I got my 300D, only switching to RAW when I finally got a 1GB CF card and a new external hard disk. I thought I&#039;d try it for a while - and now, I regret the images I shot in JPEG way back when, wishing that I&#039;d shot them all on RAW. Funny how different people&#039;s perspectives can be, isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a really interesting set of articles. I shot JPEG for about 18 months after I got my 300D, only switching to RAW when I finally got a 1GB CF card and a new external hard disk. I thought I&#8217;d try it for a while &#8211; and now, I regret the images I shot in JPEG way back when, wishing that I&#8217;d shot them all on RAW. Funny how different people&#8217;s perspectives can be, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
