<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The odd one out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inphotos.org/the-odd-one-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inphotos.org/the-odd-one-out/</link>
	<description>no photoshopped images here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:13:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daze</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/the-odd-one-out/#comment-48691</link>
		<dc:creator>Daze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/odd-one-out-2/#comment-48691</guid>
		<description>The blurring that you&#039;ve done on this photo is perfect. When I first saw it, I thought it must have been taken with a lens with a seriously big aperture, especially on a photo this wide-angle. After reading though, you say you&#039;ve done this in post-processing. It looks very realistic, very well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blurring that you&#8217;ve done on this photo is perfect. When I first saw it, I thought it must have been taken with a lens with a seriously big aperture, especially on a photo this wide-angle. After reading though, you say you&#8217;ve done this in post-processing. It looks very realistic, very well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
