<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Canon 40D won&#8217;t tempt me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inphotos.org/the-canon-40d-wont-tempt-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inphotos.org/the-canon-40d-wont-tempt-me/</link>
	<description>no photoshopped images here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:01:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nate Griffin</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/the-canon-40d-wont-tempt-me/#comment-208393</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/the-canon-40d-wont-tempt-me/#comment-208393</guid>
		<description>Donncha, I couldn&#039;t agree more.  Most of the changes camera manufacturers are making these days are convenience items like live-view and larger LCD&#039;s.  The image quality is not making the large jumps like a few models ago, at least not for Canon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donncha, I couldn&#8217;t agree more.  Most of the changes camera manufacturers are making these days are convenience items like live-view and larger LCD&#8217;s.  The image quality is not making the large jumps like a few models ago, at least not for Canon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnK</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/the-canon-40d-wont-tempt-me/#comment-103760</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 08:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/the-canon-40d-wont-tempt-me/#comment-103760</guid>
		<description>I tried out the 40D at a local camera store in Palo Alto that hosted a Canon event. I love it. I&#039;m upgrading from the original Rebel. The appearance of the image for review after taking a picture is almost instantaneous not many seconds as on my 300D. The picture data is now 14 bit not 12 bit allowing for more dynamic range. The image data is lower noise allowing for the use of higher ISO values. ISO 1600 with the noise filter on is impressive.

It is unlikely any manufacturer will develop rapidly enough to drive upgrades with every model. I usually upgrade cameras and computers about every three years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried out the 40D at a local camera store in Palo Alto that hosted a Canon event. I love it. I&#8217;m upgrading from the original Rebel. The appearance of the image for review after taking a picture is almost instantaneous not many seconds as on my 300D. The picture data is now 14 bit not 12 bit allowing for more dynamic range. The image data is lower noise allowing for the use of higher ISO values. ISO 1600 with the noise filter on is impressive.</p>
<p>It is unlikely any manufacturer will develop rapidly enough to drive upgrades with every model. I usually upgrade cameras and computers about every three years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video demonstration of the Canon 40D &#124; In Photos dot org</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/the-canon-40d-wont-tempt-me/#comment-93009</link>
		<dc:creator>Video demonstration of the Canon 40D &#124; In Photos dot org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/the-canon-40d-wont-tempt-me/#comment-93009</guid>
		<description>[...] Canon 40D is expected in early September, and I know I said I wasn&#8217;t tempted but pictures speak a thousand words, and video shout loudest of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canon 40D is expected in early September, and I know I said I wasn&#8217;t tempted but pictures speak a thousand words, and video shout loudest of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Primo</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/the-canon-40d-wont-tempt-me/#comment-92856</link>
		<dc:creator>Primo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 04:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/the-canon-40d-wont-tempt-me/#comment-92856</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s official now , Release date September &#039;07. Check Canon Website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s official now , Release date September &#8216;07. Check Canon Website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dancing Shades of Light :: on a new camera</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/the-canon-40d-wont-tempt-me/#comment-92764</link>
		<dc:creator>Dancing Shades of Light :: on a new camera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 13:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/the-canon-40d-wont-tempt-me/#comment-92764</guid>
		<description>[...] sealing. And 1.6 crop factor. How accurate all that is remains open to debate. Donncha reckons he&#8217;s not in the market for a 40D. I&#8217;m not so much in the market for a 40D as for a) much higher than 3 fps and b) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sealing. And 1.6 crop factor. How accurate all that is remains open to debate. Donncha reckons he&#8217;s not in the market for a 40D. I&#8217;m not so much in the market for a 40D as for a) much higher than 3 fps and b) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donncha O Caoimh</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/the-canon-40d-wont-tempt-me/#comment-92414</link>
		<dc:creator>Donncha O Caoimh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/the-canon-40d-wont-tempt-me/#comment-92414</guid>
		<description>That reminds me, remember the days when computers were getting faster and faster and it really made a difference when you upgraded? Now they&#039;re at the stage where buying the latest and greatest isn&#039;t that important. I think the same is happening with DSLRs.

Is there any really convincing reason for an amateur photographer to choose Nikon over Canon? Their entry level cameras are so close it&#039;s hard to figure out which is better. Does it matter in the end anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That reminds me, remember the days when computers were getting faster and faster and it really made a difference when you upgraded? Now they&#8217;re at the stage where buying the latest and greatest isn&#8217;t that important. I think the same is happening with DSLRs.</p>
<p>Is there any really convincing reason for an amateur photographer to choose Nikon over Canon? Their entry level cameras are so close it&#8217;s hard to figure out which is better. Does it matter in the end anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gamma Goblin</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/the-canon-40d-wont-tempt-me/#comment-92413</link>
		<dc:creator>Gamma Goblin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/the-canon-40d-wont-tempt-me/#comment-92413</guid>
		<description>I deleted a comment I was going to post yesterday... something along the lines of &quot;Blink and they&#039;ll be replacing the 40D with a newer model again&quot;.... Collin&#039;s &quot;Blink&quot; comment made me post this :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I deleted a comment I was going to post yesterday&#8230; something along the lines of &#8220;Blink and they&#8217;ll be replacing the 40D with a newer model again&#8221;&#8230;. Collin&#8217;s &#8220;Blink&#8221; comment made me post this <img src='http://inphotos.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donncha O Caoimh</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/the-canon-40d-wont-tempt-me/#comment-92376</link>
		<dc:creator>Donncha O Caoimh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/the-canon-40d-wont-tempt-me/#comment-92376</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s rumours, true, but the 30D was only a small incremental improvement and I think it&#039;s probably being squeezed from top and bottom by the 5D and 400D. If you look at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/cameras/canon/&quot;&gt;Flickr Canon Cameras&lt;/a&gt; page it&#039;s obvious what the most popular model is.
The 20D does come in at a respectable 3rd place though :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s rumours, true, but the 30D was only a small incremental improvement and I think it&#8217;s probably being squeezed from top and bottom by the 5D and 400D. If you look at the <a href="http://www.flickr.com/cameras/canon/">Flickr Canon Cameras</a> page it&#8217;s obvious what the most popular model is.<br />
The 20D does come in at a respectable 3rd place though <img src='http://inphotos.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collin</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/the-canon-40d-wont-tempt-me/#comment-92364</link>
		<dc:creator>Collin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/the-canon-40d-wont-tempt-me/#comment-92364</guid>
		<description>But it&#039;s still just rumours.  There&#039;s nothing official from Canon that the 40d even exists yet is there?  Or did I blink and miss that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But it&#8217;s still just rumours.  There&#8217;s nothing official from Canon that the 40d even exists yet is there?  Or did I blink and miss that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
