<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stock photography? Is that a bad word?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inphotos.org/stock-photography-is-that-a-bad-word/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inphotos.org/stock-photography-is-that-a-bad-word/</link>
	<description>no photoshopped images here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:01:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stock photography</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/stock-photography-is-that-a-bad-word/#comment-2281</link>
		<dc:creator>stock photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 01:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/2005/10/16/stock-photography-is-that-a-bad-word/#comment-2281</guid>
		<description>I think its not so.
Check out this introduction article on Stock_photography:
http://www.articleworld.org/Stock_photography
Content:
1.History
2.How it works
3.Client/ buyer options
4.Photographer options</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its not so.<br />
Check out this introduction article on Stock_photography:<br />
<a href="http://www.articleworld.org/Stock_photography" rel="nofollow">http://www.articleworld.org/Stock_photography</a><br />
Content:<br />
1.History<br />
2.How it works<br />
3.Client/ buyer options<br />
4.Photographer options</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
