<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SF AWS 1909</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inphotos.org/sf-aws-1909/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inphotos.org/sf-aws-1909/</link>
	<description>no photoshopped images here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:13:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Flickr: shutterhack</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/sf-aws-1909/#comment-97874</link>
		<dc:creator>Flickr: shutterhack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 07:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/sf-aws-1909/#comment-97874</guid>
		<description>
&quot;Composition&quot; comes from &quot;composite,&quot; which has more to do with a variety of elements coming together as a whole. In a composition parts are related precisely because of the whole. One of main factors to be taken into account when we compose is relationship between elements of a photograph. The question I&#039;d like to raise will sound something like this &quot;What is it about the relationship of the objects in a picture that makes it interesting to see?&quot; For example at f2.8, the compositional relationship of the main subject to its surroundings will be much different than at f22. It still seems to me that this photo here was created with very good compositional qualities and a sure excellent piece of work.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Composition&quot; comes from &quot;composite,&quot; which has more to do with a variety of elements coming together as a whole. In a composition parts are related precisely because of the whole. One of main factors to be taken into account when we compose is relationship between elements of a photograph. The question I&#8217;d like to raise will sound something like this &quot;What is it about the relationship of the objects in a picture that makes it interesting to see?&quot; For example at f2.8, the compositional relationship of the main subject to its surroundings will be much different than at f22. It still seems to me that this photo here was created with very good compositional qualities and a sure excellent piece of work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mac</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/sf-aws-1909/#comment-97651</link>
		<dc:creator>mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/sf-aws-1909/#comment-97651</guid>
		<description>nice  pic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice  pic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
