<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scary! Scary! Google forgets In Photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/</link>
	<description>no photoshopped images here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:01:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: victoria</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/#comment-205986</link>
		<dc:creator>victoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 05:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/#comment-205986</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t u know there r still some sceary photo on ur computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t u know there r still some sceary photo on ur computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT Support Small Medium Business &#187; Scary 2 : links disappeared on Google Site search</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/#comment-50175</link>
		<dc:creator>IT Support Small Medium Business &#187; Scary 2 : links disappeared on Google Site search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/#comment-50175</guid>
		<description>[...] Two days ago, there was over forty! What a coincidence, yesterday I just read on inphotos.org about such a scare. An offending &#8216;&amp;&#8217; as category name caused the sitemap by UTWgoogleSitemaps [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Two days ago, there was over forty! What a coincidence, yesterday I just read on inphotos.org about such a scare. An offending &#8216;&#38;&#8217; as category name caused the sitemap by UTWgoogleSitemaps [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rirath</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/#comment-49238</link>
		<dc:creator>Rirath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 15:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/#comment-49238</guid>
		<description>My Google traffic has actually more the doubled over the past few days, though it&#039;s still a mere fraction of yours.  Would be interesting to know if it&#039;s just the Google Dance in motion or if such a small sitemap error really did cause such large problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Google traffic has actually more the doubled over the past few days, though it&#8217;s still a mere fraction of yours.  Would be interesting to know if it&#8217;s just the Google Dance in motion or if such a small sitemap error really did cause such large problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spurned by Google, ignored by all at Holy Shmoly!</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/#comment-48993</link>
		<dc:creator>Spurned by Google, ignored by all at Holy Shmoly!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/#comment-48993</guid>
		<description>[...] Web, WordPress.           Something strange happened on Monday to my photoblog, In Photos.org. It disappeared off Google&#8217;s radar and traffic has dropped like a stone [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web, WordPress.           Something strange happened on Monday to my photoblog, In Photos.org. It disappeared off Google&#8217;s radar and traffic has dropped like a stone [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan 19th ad filter updates at Not Spam</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/#comment-48732</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan 19th ad filter updates at Not Spam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/#comment-48732</guid>
		<description>[...] ten days and unfortunately has been slightly down over the last 3 days because inphotos.org took a nose dive in Google&#8217;s search database. I&#8217;m not sure why but it could be related to the Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ten days and unfortunately has been slightly down over the last 3 days because inphotos.org took a nose dive in Google&#8217;s search database. I&#8217;m not sure why but it could be related to the Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daze</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/#comment-48687</link>
		<dc:creator>Daze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/#comment-48687</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve also just subscripted to your RSS feed, no adverts or weird stuff here. Looks all fine. With regards to your Google positioning, they are rolling out another data centre change, as well as toolbar PageRank updates. These might have finished by now though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also just subscripted to your RSS feed, no adverts or weird stuff here. Looks all fine. With regards to your Google positioning, they are rolling out another data centre change, as well as toolbar PageRank updates. These might have finished by now though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donncha O Caoimh</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/#comment-46375</link>
		<dc:creator>Donncha O Caoimh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/#comment-46375</guid>
		<description>Never mind the previous comment, I&#039;ve changed my ad code so that only the sidebar advert shows up now as it&#039;s the best performing here by a long mile. 

Strangely enough, the same position on ocaoimh.ie doesn&#039;t do nearly as well and it&#039;s the content adverts that draw the clicks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind the previous comment, I&#8217;ve changed my ad code so that only the sidebar advert shows up now as it&#8217;s the best performing here by a long mile. </p>
<p>Strangely enough, the same position on ocaoimh.ie doesn&#8217;t do nearly as well and it&#8217;s the content adverts that draw the clicks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donncha O Caoimh</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/#comment-46361</link>
		<dc:creator>Donncha O Caoimh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/#comment-46361</guid>
		<description>Sorry Colm, but now that you&#039;ve commented you won&#039;t see any adverts on the last month&#039;s worth of posts which is a bit of a thank you for contributing! 

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s the adverts though. A few bloggers have complained of the same thing happening to them and it righted itself eventually! Thank you for your support redmum!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Colm, but now that you&#8217;ve commented you won&#8217;t see any adverts on the last month&#8217;s worth of posts which is a bit of a thank you for contributing! </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s the adverts though. A few bloggers have complained of the same thing happening to them and it righted itself eventually! Thank you for your support redmum!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redmum</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/#comment-46355</link>
		<dc:creator>redmum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/#comment-46355</guid>
		<description>Ach but there are still some of us who are passing by :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ach but there are still some of us who are passing by <img src='http://inphotos.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colm</title>
		<link>http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/#comment-46337</link>
		<dc:creator>Colm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inphotos.org/scary-scary-google-forgets-in-photos/#comment-46337</guid>
		<description>I follow your blog, I&#039;m subscribed to it twice, but when I clicked on the link to read it, I see 15 ads! and it&#039;s not immediately obvious where the content is. Could it just be a case of being de-rated because of that? It really does look excessive! I&#039;d go mad if I wasn&#039;t just following the RSS feed :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I follow your blog, I&#8217;m subscribed to it twice, but when I clicked on the link to read it, I see 15 ads! and it&#8217;s not immediately obvious where the content is. Could it just be a case of being de-rated because of that? It really does look excessive! I&#8217;d go mad if I wasn&#8217;t just following the RSS feed <img src='http://inphotos.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
