Comments on: Is the Canon 30D noisier than the 20D? http://inphotos.org/is-the-canon-30d-noisier-than-the-20d/ no photoshopped images here Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:13:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Kenny http://inphotos.org/is-the-canon-30d-noisier-than-the-20d/#comment-167379 Kenny Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:54:18 +0000 http://inphotos.org/is-the-canon-30d-noisier-than-the-20d/#comment-167379 I've got both of the cameras and I think the noise performance are just very similar. I’ve got both of the cameras and I think the noise performance are just very similar.

]]> By: ryan http://inphotos.org/is-the-canon-30d-noisier-than-the-20d/#comment-18167 ryan Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:58:28 +0000 http://inphotos.org/is-the-canon-30d-noisier-than-the-20d/#comment-18167 As someone who owns both a 30D and 20D, I can't see that the 30 is noisier in any way. As someone who owns both a 30D and 20D, I can’t see that the 30 is noisier in any way.

]]> By: Treasa http://inphotos.org/is-the-canon-30d-noisier-than-the-20d/#comment-17907 Treasa Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:06:10 +0000 http://inphotos.org/is-the-canon-30d-noisier-than-the-20d/#comment-17907 I was interested in the comment that shooting in RAW + Jpeg led to the RAW files largely getting forgotten about because it was too time consuming to do the individual processing. That's such a statement of reality, I was overwhelmed. I was interested in the comment that shooting in RAW + Jpeg led to the RAW files largely getting forgotten about because it was too time consuming to do the individual processing. That’s such a statement of reality, I was overwhelmed.

]]> By: John http://inphotos.org/is-the-canon-30d-noisier-than-the-20d/#comment-17892 John Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:52:17 +0000 http://inphotos.org/is-the-canon-30d-noisier-than-the-20d/#comment-17892 Similar conversations are going on about the sony Alpha versus Nikon. Both use the same sensor (Sony CMOS) and front filter. But the Nikon circuitry is different and appears to have some inbuilt noise reduction, ignoring any post processing. The other side is that the Sony appears tp out perform the Nikon on resolution and if using RAW images and post processing on your PC can produce pictures with greater detail showing less noise than the Nikon. Back in the real world the difference in hardware isn't going to make a difference to my Ansel Adam's like photographic elite skills. But for the rest of you mere mortals the hardware obviously makes all the difference. :D Similar conversations are going on about the sony Alpha versus Nikon. Both use the same sensor (Sony CMOS) and front filter. But the Nikon circuitry is different and appears to have some inbuilt noise reduction, ignoring any post processing. The other side is that the Sony appears tp out perform the Nikon on resolution and if using RAW images and post processing on your PC can produce pictures with greater detail showing less noise than the Nikon.

Back in the real world the difference in hardware isn’t going to make a difference to my Ansel Adam’s like photographic elite skills. But for the rest of you mere mortals the hardware obviously makes all the difference. :D

]]>